CF
ClearFeed
Trust Analysis
21Trust
Fabricated
πŸ” Web VerifiedπŸ” Search Verified
Elon MuskonX / Twitter17d ago
Their next step is to agree that there are large numbers of illegals voting (or usually getting harvested by Dem operatives who pick up their ballots and fill them out) and that it is a good thing and anyone who opposes it is racist x.com/mazemoore/stat…
Trust Metrics
13
Accuracy
22
Framing
25
Context
35
Tone
Accuracy13%
Framing22%
Context25%
Tone35%
Analysis Summary
Musk claims noncitizen voting happens at large scale via Democratic ballot harvesting, but investigations show it's exceedingly rare. USCIS and state audits found less than 0.03% of voter records contained actual noncitizens; where registration errors occurred, actual voting was measured in dozens to low hundreds per state. There's no evidence of a coordinated Democratic effort to harvest noncitizen ballots, and cases of illegal voting from any source amount to a tiny fraction of ballots cast over the past two decades. The post conflates isolated registration glitches (like New Jersey's software error) with systematic illegal voting.
Claims Analysis (3)
β€œThere are large numbers of illegals voting”
Multiple investigations show noncitizen registration is vanishingly rare. USCIS data shows 0.03% of records reviewed warranted further scrutiny. Even the largest state claims (New Jersey's 6,600 glitched registrations) represent tiny fractions of voters, with evidence of actual voting measured in dozens to low hundreds.
βœ• False
β€œDemocrats get illegals' ballots harvested by operatives who fill them out”
No coordinated effort found. NPR/CEIR report explicitly states no state found any coordinated noncitizen voting effort in 2024 election. Ballot harvesting is legal in some states but actual fraud detected amounts to less than 0.000043% of total ballots cast 2000-2022. No evidence supports systematic Democratic operatives harvesting noncitizen ballots.
βœ• False
β€œAnyone opposing this is racist”
This is predictive characterization of opposition arguments, not a verifiable factual claim. It's framed as a rhetorical prediction about future Democratic framing rather than a describable fact.
πŸ’¬ Opinion
⚠ Flags (2)
😨 Appeal to Fear
βš–οΈ False Equivalence
Was this analysis helpful?
Try ClearFeed free β†’
clearfeed.app β€” Trust scores for your social feed