A Texas teen was convicted of murder for stabbing a student at a track meet in 2025, receiving a 35-year sentence. This post uses extreme sarcasm to argue that smiling in social media videos does not justify or excuse the killing — but deploys the rhetorical inversion (claiming to reverse his position) in a way designed to mock and delegitimize sympathy or defense arguments around the defendant, while implying that any questioning of the severity or fairness of the outcome is absurd. The framing weaponizes a real case against unspecified advocates without engaging their actual arguments.