Walsh claims he criticizes LGBTQ+ activism consistently across multiple countries but faces accusations of applying different standards to Israel specifically—a charge he denies by flipping responsibility to his critics. The post is a rhetorical argument about perceived double standards rather than a factual assertion, and the underlying premise (that he has a pattern of international criticism) is consistent with his public record. What's missing: the specific context of what prompted this statement—the linked tweet he's responding to—which would clarify whether his accusation of selective criticism holds up against the actual criticism he receives.