78Trust
Verified
🔍 Web Verified🔍 Search Verified
joyce_white_vanceonThreads3d ago
I wrote this piece ahead if the 2020 election. Even tho its CA not ‘Bama, and we’re no longer in a pandemic, the key points are still the same & the touchback to Trump’s 2020 behavior is instructive. https://www.al.com/opinion/2020/09/joyce-white-vance-do-not-be-alarmed-if-the-election-night-count-is-slow.html
Trust Metrics
82
75
70
80
Accuracy82%
Framing75%
Context70%
Tone80%
Analysis Summary
Joyce Vance is resharing her 2020 AL.com op-ed explaining why slow election night counts aren't evidence of fraud, applying the lesson to the current California election where Republicans lost the LA mayor race. The underlying point holds up — California's slow count is a known feature of its mail-ballot rules, and outlets like the LA Times and Guardian have explained the mechanics. JD Vance and other Republicans have publicly called the California results 'shady,' echoing 2020-style fraud framing without evidence. What the post doesn't mention: the Supreme Court is weighing a case that could bar California from accepting ballots after election day, which would reshape how fast future counts move.
Claims Analysis (2)
“Slow election night vote counts are normal and not evidence of fraud, as illustrated by a 2020 piece written ahead of that election.”
Election experts and multiple outlets confirm slow counts in states like CA are routine due to mail ballot processing rules.
“Trump's 2020 behavior around slow vote counts is instructive for understanding current GOP reactions to the California election.”
Analytical comparison; Vance and other Republicans have echoed 2020-style fraud claims about California's count per Democracy Docket and New Republic.
Was this analysis helpful?
Try ClearFeed free →