This post shares commentary by Ross Greer criticizing BBC framing of Belfast riots. The core factual claim — that the BBC described the disorder as anti-immigration protests — is verified by multiple outlets. The post's point about language and legitimacy is fair: news outlets did use 'anti-immigration' framing, and Greer argues calling rioters 'campaigners' sanitizes racist violence. The post uses strong moral language ('racist rioters,' 'scumbag') but the underlying observation about media framing is legitimate media criticism, not hyperbole. However, 'anti-immigration' isn't entirely wrong — the disorder was triggered by and involved immigration-related grievances; calling it both 'racist' and 'anti-immigration' isn't contradictory, just emphasizing different aspects. The framing somewhat presents these as mutually exclusive when they overlap.