CF
ClearFeed
Trust Analysis
84Trust
Likely Accurate
🔍 Web Verified
u/GorotheninjaonReddit6h ago
US patent office revokes Nintendo’s patent on summoning characters to make them battle | VGC
Trust Metrics
85
Accuracy
88
Sources
80
Framing
80
Context
Claim Accuracy85%
Source Quality88%
Framing & Tone80%
Context80%
Analysis Summary
This is real — the USPTO did reject Nintendo's patent on the summoning-and-battle mechanic. The article is well-sourced, citing the actual patents the USPTO used to invalidate it (including a 2002 Konami patent covering the same mechanic). The piece is straightforward reporting with good context about what happens next (Nintendo can appeal). One minor gap: it doesn't explain whether USPTO director Squires had any public reason for personally intervening, though the mechanic's obviousness in light of prior art is clear.
Claims Analysis (5)
US patent office revokes Nintendo's patent on summoning characters to make them battle
USPTO rejected all 26 claims in the patent; non-final decision allowing appeal.
Verified
Nintendo was granted a US patent last September covering summoning characters to battle
Confirmed in article; patent granted September 2025.
Verified
USPTO director personally ordered re-examination without another company officially getting involved
Article states John A Squires personally ordered re-examination; first time since 2012.
Verified
USPTO cited previous patents (Yabe, Taura, Motokura, Shimomoto) as invalidating the mechanic's patentability
All patents named and sourced in USPTO decision; Yabe (Konami 2002), Taura (Nintendo 2020), Motokura (Nintendo 2022), Shimomoto (Bandai Namco 2020).
Verified
Nintendo has two months to respond or appeal the decision
Article explicitly states non-final decision allows two-month response or appeal to Federal Circuit.
Verified
Was this analysis helpful?
Try ClearFeed free
clearfeed.app — Trust scores for your social feed