Open Rights Group warns that pending UK Children's Bill amendments would give ministers broad, unregulated powers to mandate digital ID age checks and restrict internet access for under-18s. The core claims are verified—Amendment 38B does authorize age-verification requirements, and Amendment 37(a) grants ministers sweeping content-restriction powers without requiring proof of harm. The framing emphasizes worst-case risks (ideological censorship of LGBTQ content) which are plausible under the broad language but speculative. The post skips structural context: why these amendments exist, what child safety concerns they aim to address, or whether the Online Safety Bill's existing age-assurance framework influenced this approach. As advocacy, it's legitimate; as reporting, it's one-sided.