CF
ClearFeed
Trust Analysis
83Trust
Verified
Human Fact-Checked
DB 🌱💦onMastodon4d ago
This is good news! The scientists behind the new independent organization Climate.us are the same experts Trump fired because they were researching and reporting on climate change. Formerly NOAA’s http://Climate.gov, they didn’t disappear. They rebuilt. Now they’re independent and preserving climate data, outside of political interference, with public support and a team of volunteer scientists. #ClimateChange #GlobalWarming #Science #Research
Trust Metrics
88
Accuracy
82
Framing
70
Context
85
Tone
Accuracy88%
Framing82%
Context70%
Tone85%
Analysis Summary
Former NOAA scientists fired by the Trump administration in 2025 rebuilt Climate.gov as an independent nonprofit called Climate.us and relaunched it in June 2026 to preserve public access to climate data outside government control. The move restores a federal resource that was shut down when the administration took office, maintaining continuity of climate research archiving that would otherwise have been lost. What makes this significant: it shows how institutional knowledge and critical data infrastructure can survive political disruption when scientists organize independently — but it also highlights that the original government site had to close for this workaround to become necessary.
Independent Fact-Check
Checked by Snopes.com
Rating False
Review date 1/19/2022
The Anne Frank 'Good News' Quote Is Fake
Claims Analysis (3)
The scientists behind Climate.us are the same experts Trump fired because they were researching and reporting on climate change.
NPR, NYT, and Futurism all confirm that former NOAA staffers fired by Trump administration launched Climate.us in 2025-2026.
Verified
Climate.us is the former NOAA Climate.gov, rebuilt independently.
Multiple sources confirm the site was shut down by Trump administration and former NOAA employees rebuilt it as an independent platform.
Verified
The team is now preserving climate data outside of political interference, with public support and volunteer scientists.
Sources confirm independent operation and public mission to preserve climate data. 'Volunteer scientists' is plausible given NOAA context but not explicitly detailed in available coverage.
Mostly True
Was this analysis helpful?
Try ClearFeed free
clearfeed.app — Trust scores for your social feed