74Trust
Likely Accurate
π Web Verified
David HoonMastodon3d ago
Two papers by Max Planck, the legendary Nobel laureate in physics, were retracted by Springer Nature in 2011, likely due to an algorithm flagging the papers for self-plagiarism and copyright infringement. Read on for how stupid it all is.
https://www.science.org/content/article/why-have-papers-one-history-s-most-famous-physicists-been-retracted?utm_campaign=News
Trust Metrics
80
65
70
70
Accuracy80%
Framing65%
Context70%
Tone70%
Analysis Summary
Springer Nature retracted two papers by Max Planck (published in the 1940s) in 2011 using an automated bot that flagged them as copyright violationsβa mistake, since republishing the same work in different journals was common practice at the time and even Einstein did it. The retractions have since been widely criticized as an embarrassing example of journals automating retraction decisions without human review, and the Science article notes that the flagged PDFs now return blank pages. The core story is real and well-sourced, though the post's framing ("how stupid it all is") reflects opinion rather than fully explaining why the bot made the error.
Claims Analysis (2)
βTwo papers by Max Planck were retracted by Springer Nature in 2011β
Confirmed by Science Magazine article and multiple independent sources. The retractions occurred in 2011 for papers originally from the 1940s.
βThe retractions were likely due to an algorithm flagging the papers for self-plagiarism and copyright infringementβ
Science article and X posts from Niko McCarty and Greg Egan confirm automated bot retractions occurred, but the Science article indicates the flagging was for copyright violations based on prior publication rather than self-plagiarism specifically. The mechanism was algorithmic/automated, not manual review.
Verify Yourself
Was this analysis helpful?
Try ClearFeed free β