The post accurately names real Trump statements and actions (rally rhetoric, Jan 6 pardons, Iran strikes) but overstates his language on immigration and uses shrug emojis to imply media silence—when Reuters, NYT, and Guardian coverage shows they've actively reported on these controversies. The argument conflates 'media didn't frame it as Rashid would prefer' with 'media ignored it,' which is a framing choice rather than a factual claim. Democrats did criticize Trump's rhetoric; whether that criticism was itself 'violent rhetoric' is contested and depends on which Democrats and which statements you're measuring.