57Trust
Partially True
π Web Verified
Gerry McGovernonMastodon2d ago
I've spent 30 years working with some of the largest organizations in the world on their data and content.
Here's a universal truth.
Most data is slop.
Most data is crap.
At least 90% of data in a typical org should be deleted. Data centers were slop-houses long before slop AI.
Data centers are glorified data dumps and senior management has never, ever cared because it's always been "cheaper" to "solve" the data problem by buying more storage.
We are killing the planet for crap data.
Trust Metrics
47
60
55
55
Accuracy47%
Framing60%
Context55%
Tone55%
Analysis Summary
A longtime digital content consultant argues that many organizations retain excessive amounts of low-value or obsolete data. While estimates of how much corporate data is redundant, obsolete, or unused vary widelyβranging from 30% to 80-90% depending on how you define "dark" dataβthe core point holds: a significant portion of stored data goes unused and creates unnecessary costs.
Data centers do consume substantial energy, and that's a real concern as workloads grow. However, the connection between data hoarding and environmental waste is more nuanced than simply calling storage "junk"βthe real issue is that organizations often lack clear retention and deletion policies, which means they buy more storage than necessary and accumulate data they don't need.
What's worth noting: as AI training becomes more common, companies face pressure to keep even low-value data "just in case" it might be useful for training. That trend could make the retention problem worse, not better. The practical takeaway isn't that most data should be deleted wholesale, but that organizations need clearer policies about what data actually needs to be kept and for how long.
Claims Analysis (3)
βAt least 90% of data in a typical org should be deleted.β
Industry analysts (Gartner, Veritas) have estimated 50-80% of enterprise data is 'dark' or redundant/obsolete/trivial (ROT). The 90% figure is at the high end but in the ballpark of expert estimates.
βData centers are glorified data dumps because it's been cheaper to buy more storage than solve the data problem.β
Reflects a widely-held view among data governance experts that storage costs falling faster than cleanup labor costs has driven hoarding behavior.
βWe are killing the planet for crap data.β
Data centers consume roughly 1-2% of global electricity (IEA estimates) and that share is rising fast with AI. Storing useless data does contribute to emissions, though 'killing the planet' is rhetorical.
Verify Yourself
Was this analysis helpful?
Try ClearFeed free β