82Trust
Highly Accurate
🔍 Web Verified
New ScientistonBluesky2d ago
Training programmes for people with aphantasia – the inability to create mental images – are challenging neuroscientists' understanding of how we create thoughts
Trust Metrics
82
85
80
80
Claim Accuracy82%
Source Quality85%
Framing & Tone80%
Context80%
Analysis Summary
A New Scientist journalist with aphantasia (inability to create mental images) completed training to develop visual imagery, raising questions about whether this neurological trait is innate or developable. The article is well-reported and cites real research — Adam Zeman did formally identify aphantasia in 2010, roughly 4% of people have complete aphantasia, and neuroscience confirms that vision and imagination use overlapping brain regions. What remains uncertain is whether individual 'breakthroughs' reported by trainers reflect genuine neuroplasticity or are artifacts of subjective self-assessment — a limitation the article itself acknowledges.
Claims Analysis (6)
“Aphantasia is the inability to create mental images”
Widely documented neurological phenomenon. Adam Zeman formally named it in 2010.
“Training programmes are challenging neuroscientists' understanding of how we create thoughts”
Article documents trainers reporting 'breakthroughs' in visual imagery, raising questions about whether aphantasia is innate or developable. This does challenge prior assumptions, though 'challenging understanding' is interpretive framing.
“Roughly 4 per cent of people have always seen nothing (complete aphantasia)”
Article cites UK study finding ~4% prevalence of lifelong complete aphantasia. Consistent with published research on aphantasia epidemiology.
“Aphantasia was scientifically named 16 years ago (2010)”
Adam Zeman published first formal case report in 2010. Math checks: 2010 + 16 = 2026 (current year).
“A coach named Alec Figueroa has recorded 87 'breakthroughs' among more than 90 trainees”
Specific claim about one coach's results. No independent verification available. 'Breakthroughs' are self-reported subjective experiences, not objectively measured outcomes.
“Mental imagery relies on the same neurons as vision and uses the same neural code”
Multiple independent sources (NPR, Caltech, Science News, ZME Science) confirm that sight and imagination activate overlapping neural pathways and use similar neural codes.
Was this analysis helpful?
Try ClearFeed free →