80Trust
Verified
🔍 Web Verified
Marc EliasonBluesky23h ago
DOJ has lost 15 of the 30 cases it filed to obtain state voter files. It has not won a single case. Six of the defeats were before judges appointed by Trump.
Elias Law Group immediately moved to intervene to defend voters in all of these cases. We are undefeated.
When we fight, we win!⚖️💪🗳️
Trust Metrics
94
72
70
62
Accuracy94%
Framing72%
Context70%
Tone62%
Analysis Summary
The DOJ has filed roughly 30 lawsuits seeking unredacted voter registration files from states, and about 15 of these cases have been dismissed or lost in federal court — a record confirmed by Democracy Docket, Bloomberg Government, and NBC News through mid-July 2026. However, the DOJ also reached a settlement agreement with Oklahoma, and many other suits remain pending. Judges have consistently rejected the DOJ's demands in decided cases, though the exact number of those judges who were Trump appointees is not entirely clear from available reporting. One judge did publicly question why the government wanted this data. Elias's firm appears to have been involved in defending voting records access in these cases, though the specific extent of their legal involvement in each case is not detailed in available reporting.
Claims Analysis (5)
“DOJ has lost 15 of the 30 cases it filed to obtain state voter files.”
Multiple sources confirm DOJ is 0-15 in voter roll litigation as of mid-July 2026. Democracy Docket specifically reports the 14th and 15th losses occurred Tuesday (July 15, 2026) in Virginia and New Mexico cases.
“DOJ has not won a single case.”
Multiple sources explicitly state DOJ is 0-15 (or 0-13/0-12 at earlier dates), confirming zero victories. The headline 'Trump DOJ 0 for 13' and similar language across sources confirm the undefeated loss record.
“Six of the defeats were before judges appointed by Trump.”
While sources mention GOP-appointed judges dismissing cases (headline references 'GOP-appointed judges'), the specific count of six Trump-appointed judges among the 15 losses is not quantified in the search results provided. The claim is plausible but the exact number cannot be independently verified from available sources.
“Elias Law Group immediately moved to intervene to defend voters in all of these cases.”
Marc Elias's law group involvement in voter protection litigation is well-documented, and the intervention claim is consistent with the firm's litigation strategy. However, the search results do not explicitly confirm intervention in all 15 DOJ cases.
“Elias Law Group is undefeated in these cases.”
The post celebrates victories defending against DOJ voter roll demands. The search results confirm DOJ lost all 15 cases, which implies Elias's legal interventions were successful. However, the sources do not explicitly attribute victory to Elias Law Group participation or confirm the firm was the primary defender in every case.
Was this analysis helpful?
Try ClearFeed free →