Here’s what the stock market might have gotten wrong about the Iran war

The Washington Post's Evan Halper reports that the stock market may be underestimating the economic damage from the Iran war, arguing that while equities have hit record highs, actual supply chain disruptions and infrastructure damage paint a bleaker picture than market valuations suggest. The reporting is sourced from a major national outlet with a named byline, and the headline-to-description framing is coherent and specific about the analytical angle (market disconnect vs. ground reality), though the article body is not provided for detailed sourcing assessment. Independent coverage from CNBC, Bloomberg, and the New York Times corroborates the central finding—that markets have indeed reached record highs despite the Iran conflict—while The Motley Fool emphasizes the historical advantage of buy-and-hold strategies during geopolitical volatility. Critical readers should monitor actual supply metrics for the Strait of Hormuz, infrastructure repair timelines, and any shifts in market sentiment if disruptions prove more persistent than current valuations assume.