The Horrors That Could Lie Ahead if Vaccines Vanish

ProPublica presents a well-researched, peer-reviewed epidemiological model from Stanford researchers with clear sourcing and methodological transparency, making this a credible foundation for the reporting. The article demonstrates strong journalistic depth—it explains the modeling approach, provides specific statistics with uncertainty ranges, and includes response from HHS—though the framing around RFK Jr.'s potential policy changes is decidedly alarming and somewhat speculative (the researchers themselves note the worst-case 'no vaccines available' scenario "doesn't feel as far-fetched" now but remains hypothetical). Readers should note the headline's dramatic language ('Horrors That Could Lie Ahead') emphasizes worst-case outcomes rather than the peer-reviewed paper's focus on more realistic partial vaccination declines, and the article uses vivid historical imagery (iron lungs, 'strangling angel') that heightens emotional impact rather than sticking to epidemiological risk alone.